<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Barbarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barbarism.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barbarism.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For the love of Dvorak by Dan</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/06/for-the-love-of-dvorak/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1779#comment-453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t remember him giving the spiel to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He saw this and only wanted to correct me on the Microsoft keyboard. He hates the natural keyboards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t remember him giving the spiel to me.</p>

<p>He saw this and only wanted to correct me on the Microsoft keyboard. He hates the natural keyboards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For the love of Dvorak by Jen</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/06/for-the-love-of-dvorak/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1779#comment-452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You never heard Alex justify his reasons for Dvorak?  I must have heard him give me the spiel at least 20 times.  I did enjoy this entry though - it was like a trip down memory lane.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You never heard Alex justify his reasons for Dvorak?  I must have heard him give me the spiel at least 20 times.  I did enjoy this entry though &#8211; it was like a trip down memory lane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For the love of Dvorak by josh</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/06/for-the-love-of-dvorak/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1779#comment-450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was just having the Dvorak conversation today - spurred by TYPEWRITERS, of all things. I&#039;ve been a Dvorak user since 2001. I switched when I was at a VERY boring job, and I completely agree that it&#039;s like rewiring your brain. In fact, I think one of the chief motivations for switching was the challenge it presented.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I, too, have though a bunch about switching back recently. For one thing, I haven&#039;t switched the layout of my iPhone to Dvorak. It&#039;s QWERTY, but it&#039;s thumb-typing qwerty, so it doesn&#039;t really mess with my muscle memory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, enjoyed the post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just having the Dvorak conversation today &#8211; spurred by TYPEWRITERS, of all things. I&#8217;ve been a Dvorak user since 2001. I switched when I was at a VERY boring job, and I completely agree that it&#8217;s like rewiring your brain. In fact, I think one of the chief motivations for switching was the challenge it presented.</p>

<p>I, too, have though a bunch about switching back recently. For one thing, I haven&#8217;t switched the layout of my iPhone to Dvorak. It&#8217;s QWERTY, but it&#8217;s thumb-typing qwerty, so it doesn&#8217;t really mess with my muscle memory.</p>

<p>Anyway, enjoyed the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pink Floyd Test by Shaggy</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/04/the-pink-floyd-test/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1573#comment-427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Been trying Mog for a few days now. Found it pretty thin on some more obscure releases (like the new Breakage). Also, the new Shooter Jennings is listed as his collaborator Hierophant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Radio feature can be confusing too because it&#039;s on by default.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been trying Mog for a few days now. Found it pretty thin on some more obscure releases (like the new Breakage). Also, the new Shooter Jennings is listed as his collaborator Hierophant.</p>

<p>The Radio feature can be confusing too because it&#8217;s on by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final Fantasy Sheds Some Skin For The West by Jim Tourville</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/03/final-fantasy-sheds-some-skin-for-the-west/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Tourville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1514#comment-413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re not an Anime fan and quirky chirpy JRPG characters grind on your nerves you might want to steer clear.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure every time the &quot;Jock&quot; melee character in FFXIII says something about &quot;Heroes gotta do X&quot; my brain throws up a red flag but the scenery, and depth of the tragedy going on around him keeps me drawn on... so far.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree though, the 40 hours is daunting. Given the style of the gameplay I get the feeling it could have easily fit into 20 hours. Mass Effect 2 hit that sweet spot for me. Less is more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not an Anime fan and quirky chirpy JRPG characters grind on your nerves you might want to steer clear.</p>

<p>Sure every time the &#8220;Jock&#8221; melee character in FFXIII says something about &#8220;Heroes gotta do X&#8221; my brain throws up a red flag but the scenery, and depth of the tragedy going on around him keeps me drawn on&#8230; so far.</p>

<p>I agree though, the 40 hours is daunting. Given the style of the gameplay I get the feeling it could have easily fit into 20 hours. Mass Effect 2 hit that sweet spot for me. Less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: Facebook Exodus by Dan</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/03/link-facebook-exodus/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1485#comment-410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think there&#039;s a case to be made here about quality versus quantity here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With advertising, Google Search has a much more active base. If I search for &quot;combat boots&quot; on Google it&#039;s pretty likely that I may be ready to buy combat boots. And if I&#039;m a company selling combat boots I want my product to be at the top.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But on Facebook - well, if I&#039;m looking for combat boots will I be searching for combat boots on Facebook? Maybe, but only if I have friends I know are combat boot afficianados. Do I even have combat boots listed in my interests? That&#039;s the only way Facebook advertisers will know I want combat boots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Social is one thing. Search is another thing. I think facebook has a lot of traffic because they&#039;ve done a good job of creating a Pavlov&#039;s dog drooling effect on its users. But Google has a lot of traffic because, well - it&#039;s Google. They&#039;re synonymous with finding information.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You seek information on Google. It drops in your lap on Facebook whether you want it or not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a case to be made here about quality versus quantity here.</p>

<p>With advertising, Google Search has a much more active base. If I search for &#8220;combat boots&#8221; on Google it&#8217;s pretty likely that I may be ready to buy combat boots. And if I&#8217;m a company selling combat boots I want my product to be at the top.</p>

<p>But on Facebook &#8211; well, if I&#8217;m looking for combat boots will I be searching for combat boots on Facebook? Maybe, but only if I have friends I know are combat boot afficianados. Do I even have combat boots listed in my interests? That&#8217;s the only way Facebook advertisers will know I want combat boots.</p>

<p>Social is one thing. Search is another thing. I think facebook has a lot of traffic because they&#8217;ve done a good job of creating a Pavlov&#8217;s dog drooling effect on its users. But Google has a lot of traffic because, well &#8211; it&#8217;s Google. They&#8217;re synonymous with finding information.</p>

<p>You seek information on Google. It drops in your lap on Facebook whether you want it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: Facebook Exodus by Joel Corriveau</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/03/link-facebook-exodus/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Corriveau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1485#comment-409</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your position here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then this morning I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/67e89ae8-30f7-11df-b057-00144feabdc0.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and thought I&#039;d come back and post it. See what you think.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does it just mean social overtaking search? That if/when Facebook tumbles, it&#039;s replacement will/must be larger. I suppose that makes common sense. While lots of Internet power users can list the services they&#039;ve hopped across over the years: IRC, ICQ, MSN, Myspace, FB, Twitter, Google Chat (Buzz, whatever), Skype.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BUT, for lots of Facebooks millions of users, I&#039;m sure Facebook was a gateway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, no one had Facebook before they had email. Tangent how email continues on a parallel plane, because it is simple and reliable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ahh, i digress. &lt;em&gt;&quot;Post Comment.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your position here.</p>

<p>Then this morning I read <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/67e89ae8-30f7-11df-b057-00144feabdc0.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> and thought I&#8217;d come back and post it. See what you think.</p>

<p>Does it just mean social overtaking search? That if/when Facebook tumbles, it&#8217;s replacement will/must be larger. I suppose that makes common sense. While lots of Internet power users can list the services they&#8217;ve hopped across over the years: IRC, ICQ, MSN, Myspace, FB, Twitter, Google Chat (Buzz, whatever), Skype.</p>

<p>BUT, for lots of Facebooks millions of users, I&#8217;m sure Facebook was a gateway.</p>

<p>Well, no one had Facebook before they had email. Tangent how email continues on a parallel plane, because it is simple and reliable.</p>

<p>Ahh, i digress. <em>&#8220;Post Comment.&#8221; </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link: Marry Him! &#8211; Magazine &#8211; The Atlantic by Joel Corriveau</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/03/link-marry-him-magazine-the-atlantic/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Corriveau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1476#comment-407</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I mean this in a good way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HA!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>And I mean this in a good way.</blockquote>

<p><strong>HA!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instapaper: The Kindle Killer App by Sheldon Richman</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/02/instapaper-the-kindle-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1346#comment-404</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone having trouble getting the entire Unread list onto the Kindle? I&#039;m getting only the top 1-4. I know about the 20-article limit, but I can&#039;t get more than four.
Sheldon&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone having trouble getting the entire Unread list onto the Kindle? I&#8217;m getting only the top 1-4. I know about the 20-article limit, but I can&#8217;t get more than four.
Sheldon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dvorak FFFFUUUUU on Apple Aluminum Keyboard by Joel Corriveau</title>
		<link>http://barbarism.net/2010/03/dvorak-ffffuuuuu-on-apple-aluminum-keyboard/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Corriveau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=1420#comment-400</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was just being a smart ass, and taking a guess from the picture you posted. No idea if that would work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just being a smart ass, and taking a guess from the picture you posted. No idea if that would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

